Okay, I guess you could kind of expect me to have this opinion, but I don't care what you think of me. This is about being a designer.
We were talking in class a few weeks ago about "genre design" which stemmed from a reading in Citizen Designer.
What is "genre design"?
I am under the impression after digesting our readings and conversations that it means the different classifications of design. Much like contemporary music is divided into genres of rock, hip-hop, jazz, indy, vocal, etc, etc, we can divide design into similar categories. Those categories are commonly known as fields like Graphic Design, Industrial Design, Architecture, and so on.
But honestly, what is the point?
Musicians are all musicians, who appreciate the music others make, and most of the music-savvy people I know tend to frown upon genre-classification. I think it has to do with creative expression, which is truly present in music. But in design, it seems (at least in my limited experience) that there need to be labels for some reason or another. I don;t want to talk about the reason for that right now, maybe later. In Design, Graphic Designers are so quick to label themselves as such because of the fancy ring it has to it, or the 'respect; they might recieve. I can see more significant divisions in the field of design when it comes to licensing, like getting a license to practice architecture in your community. But why else do we need to clarify what kind of designer we are? why does someone else have to?
It's bullshit.
Say I call myself a graphic designer. "I am a graphic designer". What does it infer in the minds of the people listening to me? It infers that I can set type appropraitely, use color, shape, image, message and content in a way I think appropriate for the project. Does it mean that I can not understand how a building is designed and how it contributes to culture? Or, on a more personal note, does "Graphic Designer" mean I don't have a good sense of scale, physically, and relationship issues in the physical realm? Does it infer to my audience that I don't care about my surroundings, my environment, my world?
I think it does.
I've met several people during my time at Architectural Metalworks that don;t understand why a (graphic)design student is interning at a design/build firm. Even architects don't get it. I like to think that I have a firmer grasp on the 3Dimensional world in my head than I do on print work, even if my portfolio or educational background says otherwise. I can blog on that later. But I think the important part of being a designer, which gets clouded out by the word always preceding it regardless of what word it is at the time, is that we can think in a largely visual way, using any means necessary to solve the given problem. Tyler introduced design as 'creative problem solving' during our sophomore year. I still feel like that is the most accurate description of what I (want to) do in life. Fuck if it is a printed poster for some concert or an identity system for a company I am passionate enough about to support, or a beautiful staircase, coffe table, DESK, or otherwise. If it serves a cultural, commercial, personal, aesthetic, or any need I deem valid, then why not pursue? Certainly not because I can't weld with a GD degree, but I could if I were, say, holding a degree in architectural design.
Okay, its late now. My concusion is this: Why label the way we think? It will inevitably effect the way we work, which effects our 'effectiveness' as cultural communicators, beauty providors, or whatever else I can't give a name to. Peace.
Tuesday, April 12, 2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
chris way to stir the pot, kid. i think maijken gets a little at how i feel on the subject. so.....here's my response:
I AM A GRAPHIC DESIGNER
i am a graphic designer. i feel comfortable with that title not because of my focus on the design of printed, physical matter but because i don't think this title limits me to only the design of print material (i think the term graphic designer spans various fields). i think graphic designers are needed in web design, industrial design, information design and any field where the VISUAL, GRAPHIC arrangement of elements (image, type, shape, color etc) for the purpose of communication.
DESIGN TOO BROAD
i think the term DESIGNER is too broad of a term to be helpful in describing what we do. As you've pointed out what an industrial designer does (and is equipped to do) is much different in practice than a web designer for example. Sure they are both 'solving problems' but in very different and specialized ways. I would argue that the most overlap between different design disciplines occurs with the graphic designer whose unique role is to solve communicative problems in multiple realms. All this differentiation is not meant to be divisive or intended to constrict designers to only specific arenas of influence but to help us focus on what we do best and work more effectively in a team with specific roles. (we know the difference between a graphic designer creating signage for a building and the architect doing it, right?)
GRAPHIC DESIGN SPANS FIELDS
So if you're a graphic designer, be proud. This does not limit you to the print field. It does however define you as a specialist working with aesthetic formal elements with the explicit purpose of communicating.
would you agree?
jenks!
love it!
design is certainly problem solving at its best. but i also think that we collaborate to tackle complex problems as a team. and it could take a welder, a typographer, a carpenter, a photographer to solve one single problem. As artifacts become more and more multicrafted and multiauthored, such a broad range of approaches and skills can be engaged in their creation, production, and use.
In 1922, W.A. Dwiggins, one of America's first book designers, described his work in bookbinding, type design, lettering, and advertising and "graphic design." Today the AIGA defines graphic design as the art of visualizing ideas.
Distinct from architectural designers is our ability to persuade, to manufacture desire, to educate, to instruct, to inform.
Wow, this is a great set of responses.
First i should say that I never meant to question the definition of a title to those who carry that tile. IE: if Matt says he is a Graphic Designer, then he is. I also fully embrace the comment Brockett made:
Distinct from architectural designers is our ability to persuade, to manufacture desire, to educate, to instruct, to inform.
I guess what you people have said is helping me hone-in on what really gets to me, and I think Tarvis and I agree (no surprise here) on how our label effects others. This has given me a goal, perhaps a life-long one, of eliminating pre-concieved definitions of what I do when I introduce myself to someone.
I fully beleive that a competent designer should be able to communicate, inspire, manufacture desire, and inform in any realm of media, from physical beatuy and utility, to the media typically inferred to Graphic Design: Print/Web.
Renaissance designer doesn;t even do it for me. DESIGNER. thats what I am, or want to become. If i have to say that I'm working on some graphic design work at the moment, so that some ignorant person can almost relate to what I do, then thats fine. Its not about what others see me as. its about what i will be doing, what I will be Designing, if I say I am a grpahic designer. I don;t want to limit myself to one field, and if labeling myself to a certain field of design does that, then I say fuck labels. (I prefer ambiguity)
Post a Comment